Mutula’s Slap From the Bench and the Rotten Politics of Wote Municipal Board
When a High Court judge dismantles your flagship urban board and declares it “unconstitutional, unprocedural, null and void,” it is not a technicality. It is an indictment. Governor Mutula Kilonzo Jnr’s humiliation over the Wote Municipal Board is not about a paperwork glitch. No. It is about the blatant contempt for law he is trained in, the process, and the public he swore to serve.
Lady Justice Teresia Mumbua Matheka’s judgment reads like a slow, methodical stripping of the administration’s excuses and excesses.
The law is clear: the Urban Areas and Cities Act demands an open, accountable recruitment process with the representation of women, youth, persons with disabilities, and marginalized groups.
The law must have known that there would be mortals like Mutula with a penchant to dodge it, and so it spoke in unambiguous clarity.
The law says four seats must be nominated by professional, private sector, informal sector, and neighbourhood associations — with evidence of how those nominees emerged.
Mutula’s government could not produce even a stamped receipt to prove its letters reached those bodies, let alone proof that nominations were genuine.
Mutula’s action was not an innocent oversight. This was governance by insider handshakes — and it has now collapsed under the weight of its own arrogance.
The court noted that except for gender balance, the governor offered no evidence that youth, disabled persons, or marginalized communities had any seat at the table.
This omission is not a clerical slip. It is a constitutional breach. The law is not an optional checklist; it is the foundation of legitimate authority.
When a governor can not respect it in something as basic as a board appointment, why should anyone trust him with budgets, tenders, or policies?
Adding insult to injury, Mutula’s administration tried to sneak in board members who had already served a full five-year term, despite the law’s unambiguous ban on reappointments.
That is not “forgetting to read the fine print.” That is daring the law to stop you — and losing. It has done just that.
The political cost is obvious. Wote now has no legally constituted municipal board.
Service delivery will suffer, urban management decisions will be frozen or challenged, and the governor must restart the process in full public glare.
Every step will now be watched for the same legal shortcuts that the court has condemned.
Balanced judgment requires us to acknowledge that Mutula did meet the gender rule and that not every allegation against individual appointees was proven. But that alone can not salvage an unconstitutional act.
It can only be cold comfort when the core process has been ruled unconstitutional. Meeting one constitutional obligation while ignoring others is like bragging about paying part of your rent while the landlord changes the locks.
The lesson is simple: public office is not a private club. Municipal boards exist to serve communities, not to reward political loyalty.
The next time the governor attempts such appointments, the law must be followed to the letter, with public participation that is real, not staged.
Until then, this judgment stands as a warning — to Mutula, and to every county boss with a taste for shortcuts: The Constitution is not your servant. It is your master. Ignore it, and you will fall.
Stay Anchored
www.theanchormedia.org
