By Martin Masai
NAIROBI, April 21, 2026 — For the family of Rex Masai, the wait for justice has been long, painful, and uncertain.
A young man from Kamuthanga in Machakos County, Masai was shot dead in Nairobi by a known police marksman at the height of the Gen Z-led protests — a moment that turned him from a participant in a national movement into one of its most tragic symbols.
Months later, an inquest into his killing continues to drag through the courts, with no clear end in sight. For his family, the slow pace of proceedings has only deepened the anguish, compounding grief with frustration over a justice system that seems unable — or unwilling — to deliver closure.
Now, a new framework by the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights is offering a renewed sense of hope, not just for the Masai family but for dozens of others affected by state brutality during the protests.
The Draft Reparations Guidelines, 2026 propose a comprehensive system of redress for victims of human rights violations, including those killed during demonstrations. Under the framework, families of victims like Masai would qualify for a minimum of Kes.3 million in compensation, alongside funeral expenses and formal acknowledgment by the State.
But beyond the monetary aspect, the guidelines seek to address a deeper wound — the absence of recognition and accountability. They call for official public apologies, memorialization of victims, and reforms within the security sector to prevent recurrence of such violence.
Crucially, the framework adopts a “reasonable basis to believe” standard in determining eligibility, lowering the burden of proof for victims’ families. This is particularly significant in cases like Masai’s, where investigations remain incomplete and justice delayed.
The guidelines also emphasize rehabilitation, including psychosocial support for families — an often overlooked need in the aftermath of state violence.
For residents of Kamuthanga, Masai’s death is not an abstract statistic but a deeply personal loss — a reminder of how national events can violently intrude into local lives. His story mirrors that of many young Kenyans who took to the streets demanding change, only to encounter lethal force.
As the inquest into his killing drags on, the KNCHR framework introduces a parallel path — one that does not replace criminal accountability but offers immediate recognition and redress to victims.
Whether the State will fully implement these proposals remains to be seen. But for the Masai family, and others like them, the guidelines signal something that has been in short supply since the protests began: A willingness to listen. A readiness to acknowledge harm, and, perhaps, the first real step toward justice.
Stay Anchored
About the Author
